Part of the paper should explain and disscuss why this topic is a problem and the other part of the paper should discuss solutions to this problem.
During the OJ Simpson trial there was concrete evidence and he was not found guilty whereas, Scott Peterson had circumstancial evidence and was convicted of manslaughter.
What will this do to the justice system and how could this be handled to prevent changing the laws to accept circumstancial evidence as the norm.

Please cite sources that are available for public knowledge, with out having a law degree.
Conclusion: I feel that justice was not served in the OJ Simpson trial and it was served in Scott Peterson trial.
How the Simpson trial was precented to the Peterson trial